NEWSLETTER ARTICLES

Franklin Laemmlen, Ph.D., County Director and Vegetables/Pest Management Advisor



From our Central Coast Agriculture Highlights newsletter -- February 2001 issue.


DUST IN AGRICULTURE OPERATIONS

Dust is part of farming. Many farm operations from field preparation, to planting, to harvesting and processing of agricultural products can involve the necessity of working in dusty conditions. Animal handling operations are no exception. Since dust and dusty conditions can often not be avoided, the next best option is to protect the individual who has to work in those conditions. A recent agriculture survey revealed that only 18% of the surveyed group used some form of dust protection - such as a scarf, disposable dust mask, or cartridge respirator - more than half the time when working in dusty conditions.

Protection for the lungs is most important with the eyes following as a close second. Workers exposed to dusty conditions should be supplied with a disposable dust mask and a pair of goggles that fit snug to the face. Under severe dust conditions, a cartridge respirator may be more appropriate. Under some conditions a head covering and coveralls may be necessary to make working in dusty conditions more comfortable.

Dust is not all the same - dust of mineral (soil) origin can have effects different from dust of plant or animal origin. Pick protective gear according to the type, intensity and duration of exposure to the dusty conditions. Many respiratory inflammations and cases of conjunctivitis could be avoided with proper dust masks and eye protection when working in dusty conditions.


PLANT AGE INFLUENCES DAMAGE SUSTAINED BY NEMATODES

Antoon Ploeg, Department of Nematology, UC Riverside

Field observations on the susceptibility of crops to nematode damage suggest that the earlier the nematodes attack a plant, the more severe the damage. In spite of these observations, there has been little research on the effect of plant age at the time of nematode attack and resulting yield loss. Systemic nematicides reportedly do not kill all the nematodes, but temporarily prevent them from reaching the plant roots. Thus, the effects of such nematicides are probably partly due to allowing very young plants to grow without nematodes.

One greenhouse study on plant growth and timing of nematode attack showed, that allowing oat plants to grow for 3 weeks before adding cereal cyst nematodes to plants resulted in much larger plants at harvest. However, the number of nematodes at which a reduction in plant growth was first observed, was not different for plants that were inoculated at seeding or much later. Thus, plant growth started to become affected at similar nematode densities, but the ultimate damage was much more severe when the nematodes attacked very young plants.

A number of alternative nematode control strategies also rely on temporarily reducing the nematode densities around the plant roots. For example, soil solarization can reduce nematodes in the upper soil layer, allowing plants to grow for some time before nematodes from deeper soil layers migrate to the growing roots. It is, therefore, important to know how long roots need to be protected from nematodes in order to avoid serious damage.

We have studied the effect of delaying nematode attack for three different nematode-crop combinations: melon and the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita, and lettuce and carrot and the free-living needle nematode Longidorus africanus. The experiments were done in pots in the greenhouse. The plants were seeded at weekly intervals, and plants of different ages were then inoculated with a range of nematode densities. Eight weeks after inoculation the experiments were stopped and data were collected.

The results showed that delaying nematode infestation had a very strong effect on the final plant weight. For example, the growth of melon plants that were inoculated at seeding, with 100 root-knot juveniles per 100 g soil, was reduced by over 90%. In contrast, growth of inoculated and seeded simultaneously survived. Plants that were 2 or 4 weeks old at inoculation, however, still yielded ca. 70% compared to the non-inoculated controls, even at very high (>1000 juveniles/100 g soil) inoculum densities.


Figure 1. Growth of melon plants 8 weeks after inoculation with root-knot nematodes Meloidogyne incognita. Plants were inoculated at seeding, or 2 or 4 weeks after seeding.

The severe damage to the melons that were inoculated at seeding was also reflected in the nematode densities at harvest. Plants which had been inoculated with 100 or more juveniles, resulting in very small plants or plant death, had very few or no nematodes recovered at harvest. However, the roots of plants which had been inoculated 2 or 4 weeks after seeding yielded very high nematode numbers at harvest. Thus, allowing melons to grow for at least 2 weeks before the nematodes attack the roots, resulted in much less damage, especially when nematode numbers were high, but at the same time resulted in much higher nematode densities at harvest.

Similar results were obtained with lettuce or carrot and the free-living needle nematode Longidorus africanus. Delaying nematode until seedlings were 2 weeks old, resulted in much less damage at harvest.

So far, all experiments on the effects of delaying the nematode infestation of plants on plant growth have been done in pots in greenhouses. We plan to test whether the strong effects that we observed in these pot experiments, also occur under field conditions.






ACHIEVING EVEN COVERAGE THROUGH DRIP TAPE

Ever wonder how long it takes for solution to run through a drip tape system? Knowing can improve uniformity of chemigation and cut down on wasted chemicals. For less than five bucks, you can have both.

"The answers are found using a simple pool-spa test kit," reveals Larry Schwankl, an irrigation specialist with the University of California Cooperative Extension. He recommends this: Inject chlorine at 10 to 20 ppm into your drip system, and determine how long it takes the chlorine to pass through the entire system. Injecting chlorine is preventive maintenance against biological clogging problems, too. Begin injecting chlorine and note the time you start. Go to the end of the drip tape run. If the tape is buried, dig around the tape until the pinhole emitter is visible. Begin collecting water samples here and test them with the chlorine kit. When chlorine shows up in the water sample, take note of the time. Figure the difference between when the chlorine was injected and when the first positive sample was taken. That is the travel time for chemicals and liquid nutrients.

This test establishes a minimum injection time for soluble inputs or washing out the system after an injection. "A common mistake when chemigating with drip is to halt an injection too soon," Schwankl and his U.C. Davis colleague Terry Prichard found. "Some of the field ends up getting more chemical than others," Schwankl says. "Another thing we’ve seen is people shutting off the system right after the injection. Parts of the field a long way from the source may not get any chemical, or certainly less than what is applied at the head of the system."

"Solution moves more slowly through drip tape, especially at the tail end of the lateral drip runs," Schwankl says. This characteristic has led to some misunderstanding. "The idea frequently was that as soon as I start injecting As for fears of applying too much water or chemicals to plants nearest the source point, he explains: "It all evens out. When you start injecting, the chemical appears at the closest emitter and moves all the way to the end, with a delay. When you shut it off, the closest emitter clears first. There is a similar delay out to the far point."

To obtain uniform coverage, Schwankl and Prichard suggest:

  • Allow the irrigation system to fill and fully pressurize.
  • Inject chemical long enough for the solution to reach the farthest point in the system. (Refer to your pool kit test results.) A longer injection period is even better.
  • Stop injecting chemical and run clean irrigation water through the system for the same period of time or longer.

(Schwankl welcomes questions. He can be e-mailed ljschwankl@ucdavis.edu or reached by phone at 530.752.4634.)

Article reprinted from the Western Advisor, November 2000, a Bayer Corp. newsletter.



AGRICULTURAL ENERGY LOAN PROGRAM
Notice of Funding Availability



Click here to download pdf file.



BACK TO VEGETABLE PAGE